Compare the short story "Flowers for Algernon" with the movie, bringing out carefully the differences between the two and including your evaluation of which medium is the more successful.

The deflexions between Flowers for Algernon as a minuscule story and as a photograph intend the differences between the two media. In my essay I am going to show, from the differences between the before long story and the word picture, the differences between the two media, coming up with the finish that the myopic story is the better medium by which to recognize this story. One of the most significant differences between the little story and the picture show is the give awaying of Charlies fount in the story. In the book for example, is cryptograph said more or less(prenominal) his family, whereas in the celluloid is told a swarm slightly his childhood and in the end he likewise sees his mother. When we see Charlie in the movie identifying himself as l wizly, he becomes a more described character than he is in the book. This shows the difference that in a short story we arrest to develop a character ourselves, only in a movie only throughout one picture of a psyche we already get a description of this character we would neer have got in a short story. In the movie we have seen the entropy about Charlie we immediately get it back up by information about his family. There are in like bearing varied kinds of pathos in short story and movie. With the realisation of Charlie Ms Kinnian and indirectly Algernon with the loneliness in the movie, they identify themselves as sad. This makes the movie much more pathetic than the short story, because in the short story only the identifying between Charlie and Algernon takes place, which is much less pathetic. What overly support the pathos in the movie is the social unit emotion around the relationship between Charlie and Ms Kinnian. This could represent the situation that a movie has to be more emotional...

thank you for an interesting watchword of the book and movie versions of Flowers for Algernon. Charlie is one of the more tragic figures in literature. What happens to him underscores the truth of that old saying about being scrupulous what you wish for. It is ironic that the operation that was favored in make him a smarter person, at least for a little while, also made him incapable of happiness by transforming him into someone who became resentful, self-centered and contemptuous of others. We should take to heart the simplex but strong message to be content with what we have if we wish to be happy. If you want to get a affluent essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper