'To what extent are humans in a technological environment free from natural selection?\r'

'Humans in engine room environment are not in truth let loose from natural extr exemplify. According to Charles Darwin, natural selection acts solo for the good of each organism, so since our very outset world ancestors had no natural defenses, they would die from what is considered straight off an insignificant disease. It was through and throughout millions of years, that the valet body started to public figure an immunization to certain diseases and only the stronger humans were the ones to dwell and carry on that trait.Likewise, having no fur on their bodies to survive in the cold weather, they learned how to intent other animals’ skins and how to build nearly weapons, in grade to chase wild animals. Nowadays, humans invite make incredible discoveries; we feature created a wonderful manhood of technology, which leads us to make close to enormous promotion in the field of medicine; especially in how to treat diseases which were, at some time, considered in curable. My point is, that since we collapse made such(prenominal) progress in technology, I am scared that we are keeping as well as many mass alive, including some that might not fit the environment in which they live.In addition, we are allowing some infertile tribe to produce through in-vitro fertilization, when manifestly they were not capable naturally. We are also allow babies survive by saving their lives at their contain even though they might not be perfectly healthy or other traits which could bedetrimental for the human species. But through science and the new technology, we have let these babies live and we have given them the chance to grow up and reproduce, transmitting their traits to other generations.Due to these facts, it is very probable that we are acting against natural selection in human beings, ever since humans became people who think and care for one some other and we have made it immoral to kill another single or to let him die. However, we coul d think about another definition of natural selection, such as a life on Earth dies if it is not sufficient to its environment and it lives if it has a niche and can reproduce in its surroundings, which is also called survival of the fittest.If we take the character of a fetus in his mother’s womb, the body of the mother can detect some errors coming from the fetus, and it would eliminate the fetus through a miscarriage. So, in this case, natural selection does still act upon human; acting within the womb of a woman, and therefore, not let a human being, which would not fit its environment, survive. For instance, we have not seen any people carrying the traits of Down’s syndrome on the chromosome 14.It is likely that this break happened before but only inside a woman’s body which eliminated the mistake through a miscarriage, not letting the future human sees the light. So, in this case, the fact that humans are life sentence longer, letting them reproduce th anks to many discoveries such as in vitro fertilization, surgeries, transplants, medication, etc. , is because we are winning into consideration that the technology is part of our environment.\r\n'