Lolita: An Analysis of Obsession Through the Decades :: Essays Papers

Lolita An Analysis of compulsion Through the Decades Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta. In 1958, Vladimir Nabokov created two of the most unrelenting characters in the history of belles-lettres Humbert Humbert and Lolita Haze. His narrators voice and main character, Humbert Humbert, explains the complex story of a man and his obsession. To wane this book off from other books about obsession, Nabokov gives Humbert possibly the most soci in ally unacceptable obsession of all pedophilia. This obsession leads Humbert on a pass across country journey to find his precious Lolita upon the discovery that she has run apart and decided to marry. It is this Lolita that causes much of the controversy in the book. Is she an innocent child who is caught up by a wave of Humbertism that seems to control her life? Or is she plain an adult i n a childs body who plays off of Humberts obsession to stimulate things for herself? The answer is sensation that involves not scarcely an analysis of the text, but excessively an analysis of the context in which the text is read. It is this analysis of context that exit supply a new appreciation for not only the elementary plot of Lolita, but also the underlying satire that riddles the book. As with all literature, many of the ideas and plot twists that supply the excitement to this particular book ar seen under a guise of the particular generation that reads it. Not only do these ideas no longer play an important part to the version as it is transferred from generation to generation, but many times the way in which a book is written can affect the reader. The most crowing case of this happening is in the works of Shakespeare. The ideas and plots he present in his books are most often lost in our contemporary corporation as we find not only his word usage, but also his themes to be archaic, and unbarring on modern life. Such is the case of Nabokovs Lolita. There is one slight difference, however, between the writing of Shakespeare, and the writing of Nabokov (and in particular Lolita).