Gender differences when attending a mirror tracing task

Gender unlikenesss when attention a reverberate tracing taskThe purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses of speed and truth when practicing Mirror butt endvas surrounded by manpower and wowork force as comfortably as the difference mingled with sexual practices with science transferring when completing this task. The sample consisted of 243, clxx females and 73 males on phone line and on campus university students who participated in the Mirror trace task for one week. Results proved that as predicted, manpower were more(prenominal) accurate and faster than wo manpower when go to to the Mirror follow task. They alike worstd higher on skill transferring than wo custody. It was concluded that men cross despatch higher on spacial tasks than women do, up to now the differences in spatial skills in the midst of men and women washbowl be credited to learning. apiece hemisphere of the conceiver specialise in different tasks, the left hemisphere is mostly r esponsible for linguistic functions while the right hemisphere is mainly responsible for decomposable visuo spatial analysis (OBoyle, Hoff Gill, 1995). The Mirror Tracing task has been studied for some years and is considered to be a study of trial and error (Ketterlinus, Sep31, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p200). Mirror Tracing has been use to study the differences between men and women, barely as indicated by), the difference in spatial ability with genders can be attributed to learning (Halpern, 2000 Kimura, 1999).On average, females perform not as well as males in spatial abilities Spence et al. (2009), mirror tracing has be interject a very important and popular study to use when determining differences in abilities. Each spatial task snapes on different aspects of it, some focus on problem solving skills where others focus on mental preference Spence et al. (2009). Mirror Tracing focuses on repetitive motions as role players are infallible to draw the same phase or springs ove r a catch of meter by only looking in the mirror at it.Mirror Tracing has its limitations as it focus is mainly on a limited amount of shapes which with judgment of conviction and practice either gender can perform well. However it does stones throw the speed and the true of how the severally gender (OBoyle, Hoff Gill, 1995). Past studies, such as O Boyle, Hoff Gill (1995), have come to a conclusion that males have excelled in spatial tasks more than females and rigid that males are able to attend to this task with more accuracy than females.In this study the aim is to determine whether speed and accuracy differs between genders and to measure the differences in skill transferability of participants of different genders. It was predicted that males will be faster and more accurate when practising mirror tracing compared to females. It was also hypothesised that males will have a higher attain with regards to skill transferability in terms of speed compared to females. meth odParticipantsThe sample consisted of 243, 170 females and 73 males online and on campus University students. The mean ages was 21.85 (SD = 5.8). All participants participated in the Mirror Tracing task for one week.MaterialsMirror tracing skills transferability of this skill in males and females was determined using a Mirror Tracing custom. Each participant was provided with instructions on how to complete the Mirror Tracing exercise and experimental material with star and gift shapes in it. Each participant had to use a mirror, pen or pencil, cardboard or analogous to block the view and a clock or stopwatch. Finally individually participant was also provided a unofficial of results sheet to note peck their individual results. To accurately score and record the results, participants had to count how many clock they touched the line and count that as one error, each sentence they went over the line was counted as two errors and any breaks in the line were counted as one err or.ProcedureBefore filling out the summary of results sheet, all participants were informed of the following the purpose of the study, nature of the study, anonymity and provided with development of how to do the Mirror Tracing task. Participants completed the task either online or on a paper copy and returned it to the instruct. The experimental material used was star and face shapes to measure speed, accuracy and skill transferability between men and women. Each participant had to trace one star and one face with each hand on twenty-four hours 1. For the next five long time each participant had to trace four star using each hand and on day 7 trace a net face and star with each hand. To complete this task, the participants had to place the sheet with the shape on it on a table with a mirror in front of it still being able to see their hand in it. They then had to hold the cardboard above the shape, check and record the time and start tracing it. This had to be done with two h ands. The participants had to record the time it took them to complete the activity on the Summary of Results sheet and return it to the tutor once completed.Resultsthither was very little mean difference in the mirror tracing exercise for day 2 day 6 between men and women in regards to speed and errors, as yet the results indicate that men tend to be quicker and more accurate than women in this spatial task. The results indicate that as predicted, men were keenly quicker and accurate than women when attempting the mirror tracing exercise as indicated in Table 1 and 2 below. Initially on day 2, women were quicker at the exercise than men and for twain participants, the speed did increased and errors decreased as the days went on, as yet the results for males are somewhat higher than females. The Standard passing for both is also very similar as indicated in Table 1 and 2 below.Table 1 involves and Standard digression of the Mirror Tracing Task daylight 2 Day 6 for speed bet ween men and womenReportGenderpractice2_timepractice3_timepractice4_timepractice5_timeFMean112.8293100.739991.637084.5834N167167167167Std. refraction75.2921664.0466058.7914249.88509MMean130.1631107.9093100.124786.8376N72717271Std. going82.4146176.3639282.3713654.71729TotalMean118.0512102.878794.194085.2558N239238239238Std. Deviation77.7411967.8695966.7092651.26775Notes F = Females M = MalesTable 2 pith and Standard Deviation of the Mirror Tracing Task Day 2 Day 6 for accuracy between men and womenReportGenderpractice2_errorspractice3_errorspractice4_errorspractice5_errorsFMean30.485024.742520.784418.1138N167167167167Std. Deviation19.7013415.1462614.2457413.26624MMean29.083325.140822.000020.2394N72717271Std. Deviation21.7351219.3754617.4791615.56137TotalMean30.062824.861321.150618.7479N239238239238Std. Deviation20.2994516.4801915.2644213.99079Notes F = Females M = MalesThe results for males for skill transferability in terms of speed when drawing the star shape were longer on day 1 however became shorter on day 7 compared to the females results. When drawing the face shape, males only have a slight difference in speed compared to women. The Standard Deviation and mean does not appear to have much of a difference in both results for both genders. The Tables below will demonstrate the results for both genders and both shapes. The results indicate that males score higher than females for skill transferability in terms of speed.Table 1Means and Standard Deviation of the Mirror Tracing Task Day 1 Day 7 for speed between men and women mastermind organiseReportGenderStar_day1_timeFMean155.9722N168Std. Deviation80.94931MMean183.7635N72Std. Deviation94.60747TotalMean164.3096N240Std. Deviation86.02650Notes F = Females M = MalesTable 2Means and Standard Deviation of the Mirror Tracing Task Day 1 Day 7 for speed between men and women Face ShapeReportGenderday1_eyes_timeDAY7_EYES_TIMEday1_beard_timeDAY7_BEARD_TIMEday1_lips_timeFMean68.926244.224150.154434.745539.10 05N170169169168170Std. Deviation69.0043333.6540250.5230335.4457360.49047MMean73.877543.945851.702932.975137.2300N7272737372Std. Deviation38.0192420.5217528.3688620.7646924.18248TotalMean70.399344.141050.621534.209238.5440N242241242241242Std. Deviation61.4005930.2889344.9481131.6900852.33488Notes F = Females M = MalesDiscussionThe results of the study support both of the hypotheses for speed, accuracy and skill transferability between men and women. There are slight differences that are noticeable in mean and Standard Deviation in both men and women. The accuracy has improved over time for both genders however there was not a noticeable difference between them. some(prenominal) genders also improved on their speed over the course of this task, however males did become faster than women when completing this task. As per Spence et al. (2009), the differences in spatial abilities between genders can be credited to learning. As place by Voyer, Voyer and Bryden (1995), men tend to do be tter in performing some spatial tasks compared to women Spence et al. (2009), and according to this study men did perform better than women. Women tend to do better than men in tests of perceptual speed (Kimura 1992), verbal eloquence and precision motor control, while males excel on some spatial tasks (OBoyle, Hoff Gill, 1995).The aim of this study was to determine whether speed and accuracy differs between genders and whether the difference in skill transferability of participants is different between genders. The results indicate that there is a difference in speed and accuracy between men and women when attending to spatial tasks. Men also tend to be able to score higher on skill transferability compared to women. These findings support the findings of O Boyle, Hoff and Gill (1995).There were some issues identified with this study that may have affected the results. The info was collected after a week with no guarantee that the off campus students have not falsified their res ults. There is no way of tracking who truly did the task accurately and who made up their results. Another issue that was identified was that the results were due on a certain date and were then extended, however the submission area was not changed and all results were to be sent to the Tutor. almost students were late with their submissions and the results were released late, which minimised the time other students got to write up the report.Overall, the results supported both hypotheses which indicated that men would generally be faster and more accurate than women when attending to the Mirror Tracing task as well as score higher on the skill transferability with spatial tasks. The aims of this report were also met as it has demonstrated the differences in gender with regards to speed and accuracy as well as the differences with skill transferability in genders.