Bias in Abstinence-Only Education

In addition to being an in encumbranceive cheque to unwanted pregnancy and agitateu all in ally transmitted diseases, frugality only procreation prevents young women from making well informed decisions about their sexuality. Cases of teen pregnancy and STD/HIV infections is on the rise despite the government allocating funds for moderation only programs. This paper seeks to look at the government policies with regard to frugality-only didactics programs and its relationship with unwanted pregnancies.It is a known fact that sexual abstemiousness is being practiced in all countries in the world as a sure way of preventing sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. Men and women of all ages who argon not ready to accept the risks that accompany sexual activeness embrace self-restraint which is a normal and acceptable practice. As a way of expressing love, affection and tenderness, absolute majority resort to intercourse and sexual activity. charge is also being used by co uples to strengthen their relationships.However, it has often been argued that using sex to cement relationships give the bounce distort ones judgment. Among women, having sex may strengthen the feeling of love but do not actually cement or deepen the relationship. Exploring sexual behavior in spite of appearance an environment of deep payload where having children is considered as a possibility is invariably rewarding. Majority of people are however not prepared for commitment hence opt for abstinence until they develop a stable relationship. temperance is 100% effective in protecting an individual from sexually transmitted.However, if the majority of the cosmos could realize its effectiveness, then we would not be having such headlines wish the ones we have seen in the past of teen births being on the rise. However, abstinence is not an easy practice considering how strong sexual drives are among gentlemans. The ordain of teen births steadily declined since 1991 and this could have been because of the intensive educational campaigns that were initiated during that period. These campaigns overwhelmd encouraging people to use hindrances and condoms and enlightening people on the risks of Aids and sexually transmitted diseases.However, today statistics now show an increase by 3% in teen births the first time ever in 14 years. (Wilson, Kelly, Patricia,2005) Is it that the sex education programs that the government adopted are no semipermanent working? The government has tried to show near effort in curbing STDs and unwanted pregnancies. The first federal abstinence-only program was enacted in 1981 and this was knowing primarily to support pregnant and parenting teenagers. This came through the adolescent Family Life work on which was also passed the same year.AFLA also funded abstinence-only programs meant to encourage responsibility and self redress among teenagers (Abstinence Only Programs 2008, p. 2). Abstinence-only programs purpose was to teach the general population and especially the teenagers how they stand to gain from abstinence. It also sought to teach abstinence from pre-marital to all takeing children. The abstinence-only program was supposed to teach the values of abstinence with regard to unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases.According to this program, the expected standard of human sexual activity revolved around a mutually sheep pen monogamous relationship. However, with all these well clarified deaths, current scientific look into shows that this program is ineffective. A study of abstinence-only-until marriages program inferred that the classes fail to serve its goal of delaying the onset of sexual activity the young people. An evaluation of 11 of these programs showed that they do not have a lasting positive effect on the asexual behavior of young people (Ibid 4).Instead of a positive effect on the young people they showed a negative willingness to use contraceptive because the pro gram emphasized on contraceptive failure. It has often been reiterated that abstinence-only programs endanger the youths because adolescents are denied complete information. These programs fail to provide contraception information and in some cases, they have been accused of providing wrong information which may lead to youths repudiation contraceptive use. Teens are exposed to pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases because of need of responsible sex education.Only safer sex intervention can reduce vulnerable sexual intercourse as compared to abstinence only programs. The Federal farm animal for abstinence -only programs have negatively influenced tames. Avery good example involves the Gloucester highschool school in Massachusetts with the summer vacations beginning 17 girls at the school are expecting babies (Kathleen Kingsbury, Wednesday June 18, 2008). This proves further the failure of the program to curb pre-marital pregnancies. In crop to reduce the prevalence of t his at the school a local pediatrist advocated for the prescription of contraceptives.However, this has been met with hostility. Amazingly it is the desire of these teens to get pregnant and this only proves how depraved their perception towards life is. An effective sex education program should include teaching teenagers about abstinence even though it is not adapted in itself. A complete and accurate information about fruitful health should be the core of teenage education. This should include abstinence measure of sexually transmitted diseases and HIV and above all prevention of pregnancy.Teenagers can only make informed and appropriate decisions if they have access to authentic information about their productive health. Cases like the one at Gloucester High School can only be prevented through enlightening the students on the dangers involved in early pregnancy. Schools should be at the forefront in teaching the science behind sex and factually based procreative health educa tion. However, much of the sex education should be done at home and young girls should be at the core of advice into the dangers of playing with boys.They should be taught the virtues of responsibility and accountability so they may grow up with the rich knowledge of the science of reproduction and its purpose. Work Cited Abstinence Only Programs, content for Gender Studies. 2005 Kingsbury, Kathleen. Pregnancy Boom at Gloucester High. Time. Wednesday June 18, 2008 Wilson, Kelly L. Goodson, Patricia Pruit. A examine of 21 curricula for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. , Journal of School Health, March 2005 Issue